The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Idaho’s Vulnerable Child Protection Act, allowing it to be enforced while litigation continues.
-
This marks the first time the Supreme Court weighed in on whether states can prohibit minors from gender transition procedures.
-
Although not a final ruling on the law’s constitutionality, the order and concurring opinions suggest the Court’s stance.
-
The ruling signals potential support for laws prohibiting gender transition procedures for minors, affecting similar laws in 22 states.
-
Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh’s opinions shed light on the Court’s approach to such cases and its readiness to intervene if needed.
-
While not a decisive victory, the ruling is significant in protecting children from irreversible procedures, moving towards a potential final victory.
Click on the video below for an explanation from Advocates Attorney, Julianne Fleischer.
Attorney Julianne Fleischer